Biddulph’s review of 14 Home Zone schemes implemented in the UK between 2002 and 2006 found that although the concept had not been fully implemented in all cases, these schemes exhibited lower traffic speeds and continued low or reduced numbers of traffic accidents compared to conditions before the Home Zones were implemented. Speed surveys were conducted for eight of the schemes, with five exhibiting speed reductions of 5 mph or more. There was information on accident rates for 12 of the schemes, with eight experiencing either no change or a small reduction. In total, for the 12 schemes overall there was found to be 3.4 less accidents per year. Residents reported that they now felt their streets were safer for their children and more attractive than they were previously. Some of those in high crime areas experienced reduced levels of crime and antisocial behaviour, although these results were not obtained everywhere. Evidence that the treatments resulted in more socialising among adults was less convincing but in general were the projects are very well received by residents, demonstrating that this approach to street design improves liveability. However, the evidence suggests that similar effects might be realised with less comprehensive and expensive solutions. Detailed studies of other schemes such as the Centre for Transport and Society’s study of the Southville scheme in Bristol found similar results. Before and after surveys found perceived improvements quality of life factors, such as traffic speeds and pedestrian safety, with residents reporting that they spent more time outside in the street and drove more safely. Speed surveys on the Stackpool Road indicated a 50% reduction in the 85^th percentile speeds.